Case 1304423/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. T Chirgwin v Ministry of Defence — 2022
- Case reference
- 1304423/2021
- Decision date
- 28 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Meichen Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. T Chirgwin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant had brought a disability discrimination claim. The respondent did not admit disability, and the tribunal made repeated case management orders requiring the claimant to provide a disability statement addressing the effect of the alleged disability on normal day-to-day activities. The claimant provided medical and other documents, but did not provide the ordered statement by the deadlines.
An unless order was made on 5 October 2022 requiring compliance by 28 October 2022, failing which the disability discrimination complaint would stand dismissed. The claimant did not comply by that date and later sought an extension and relief from sanction. The tribunal found that the claimant had understood what was required and that the requirement to provide a new statement had been made clear.
The tribunal concluded that the claimant had persistently failed to comply with three tribunal orders, had not shown a good reason for failing to comply with the unless order, and had prioritised other tasks without adequate explanation. It found the failure deliberate and contumelious, serious, and prejudicial to the respondent through delay and increased costs. Although the tribunal considered whether a fair trial remained possible, it held that the interests of justice did not justify setting aside the unless order, so the disability discrimination claim remained dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment concerns an application for relief from sanction after the disability discrimination complaint had been dismissed under an unless order. The tribunal refused to set aside the unless order, so the disability discrimination claim remained dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- Rule 38 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
- Thind v Salvesen Logistics Ltd
- Hylton v Royal Mail Group Ltd
- Enamejewa v British Gas Trading Ltd
- Morgan Motor Co Ltd v Morgan
- Singh v Singh
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.