Case 1304434/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Taylor v Blue Mountain Water Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1304434/2020
- Decision date
- 30 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment concerned the respondent's application dated 14 July 2020 for reconsideration of the judgment sent to the parties on 30 June 2020. Employment Judge Johnson refused the application under rule 72.
The tribunal said there was no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked. It noted that the respondent had failed to respond to the tribunal's email of 25 August 2020 inviting comments on the claimant's email of 31 July 2020, which had been sent in response to the reconsideration application. No substantive liability or remedy issues were decided in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This judgment only records the refusal of the respondent's application dated 14 July 2020 for reconsideration of the judgment sent on 30 June 2020. It does not set out the substantive employment claim or any separate remedy award. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 72
- no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.