Case 1304440/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Flanagan v Marilyn Roberts t/a We Make & Mend — 2021
- Case reference
- 1304440/2020
- Decision date
- 11 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Flanagan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Miss Flanagan had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered Marilyn Roberts t/a We Make & Mend to pay damages of £1,572. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,227.
The unfair dismissal claim succeeded as well, but the tribunal did not fix the remedy in this judgment. It recorded that the remedy for the unfair dismissal claim would be determined at a Remedy Hearing. The monetary awards set out in the judgment therefore total £3,799, made up of the notice damages and redundancy payment only.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £1,572 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £2,227 |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim succeeded, but remedy was to be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,799
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.