Case 1304441/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Francis v Birmingham Rathbone Society — 2020
- Case reference
- 1304441/2020
- Decision date
- 1 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Francis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing on 1 September 2020, Employment Judge Miller considered two claims brought by Miss J Francis against Birmingham Rathbone Society. The first was a breach of contract claim, identified in the judgment as wrongful dismissal. The second was a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of wages for 16, 17 and 18 December 2019.
The tribunal struck out both claims on the ground that each had no reasonable prospects of success. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as a claim for breach of contract (wrongful dismissal). | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was for unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of payment of wages for 16, 17 and 18 December 2019. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.