Case 1304453/2017 · Employment Tribunal
in person v Mr C Wilford, solicitor — 2018
- Case reference
- 1304453/2017
- Decision date
- 12 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment is a short case-management decision rather than a merits determination. The Employment Judge recorded that the claimant's representative had been admitted to hospital the previous day. The respondent did not oppose an adjournment, and the tribunal held that the interests of justice required the hearing to be postponed.
The case was relisted for 4 to 7 February 2019. The judgment also records that the bundle had been finalised and witness statements exchanged, with one copy of everything retained with the file. No substantive findings on the pleaded claims and no remedy were determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | No substantive claim was adjudicated in this judgment. The tribunal dealt only with an adjournment and relisting of the hearing. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.