Case 1304469/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Jones v Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 1304469/2017
- Decision date
- 12 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gilroy QC
- Panel members
- Mr P Wilkinson, Miss L Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Jones
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Birmingham over 8 to 12 April 2019 before Employment Judge Broughton, sitting with Mr P Wilkinson and Miss L Clark. The claimant was Miss M Rihoy and the respondent was The Energy Checking Company (Midlands) Limited. The judgment records that the claimant succeeded only in part.
The tribunal held that the claimant was owed holiday pay of £673.05 and unpaid commission of £460.39. Those sums were awarded in the judgment, giving a total of £1,133.44.
The judgment also states that all other claims failed and were dismissed. No further detail is given in the extracted text about the nature of those additional claims or the reasons they were rejected.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £673 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to 'unpaid commission' and awards £460.39 for that head of claim. | Upheld | — | £460 |
| Other | The judgment states that all other claims failed and were dismissed, but does not identify them individually in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,133
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.