Case 1304493/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Cooper v Goldby Wealth Management LLP — 2023
- Case reference
- 1304493/2023
- Decision date
- 1 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Faulkner
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Cooper
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Faulkner, sitting alone at Midlands West on 31 October 2023, recorded that Goldby Wealth Management LLP had dismissed Mr A Cooper by reason of redundancy. The tribunal held that he was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £2,569.50.
The tribunal also found that Mr Cooper's complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages were well-founded. It ordered the respondent to pay £3,026.23 for unpaid salary covering December 2022, January 2023 and February 2023, and a further £399.45 for accrued but untaken holiday on termination, in each case less any sums the respondent was required to deduct by law.
The respondent's contract claim was dismissed. No discrimination, whistleblowing or unfair dismissal findings were recorded in the judgment, and the decision was given orally at the hearing with no written reasons to follow unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded and awarded this sum for unpaid salary for December 2022, January 2023 and February 2023. | Upheld | — | £3,026 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded this further sum for accrued but untaken holiday on termination, subject to any sums the respondent was required to deduct by law. | Upheld | — | £399 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's contract claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £2,570 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,995
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.