Case 1304498/2020 · Employment Tribunal

In Person For the v Greene King Retail Services Limited — 2021

Case reference: 1304498/2020
Decision date: 24 March 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales

Indexed: 20 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

In Person For the

Respondent

Greene King Retail Services Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim because it was out of time. It found that it had been reasonably practicable for the claim to have been submitted in time, and that the claim was not submitted within a reasonable period thereafter.

The judgment records that oral reasons were given and reminds the parties of Rule 62(3) concerning written reasons being produced only if requested in accordance with that rule. No remedy was awarded.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction because the claim was out of time. The specific pleaded causes of action are not set out in the judgment text; classification follows the listing categories and should be treated with some caution.	Dismissed	—	—
Breach of contract	The judgment states the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction because the claim was out of time. The specific pleaded causes of action are not set out in the judgment text; classification follows the listing categories and should be treated with some caution.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.