Case 1304506/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Fisher v Liberty Performance Steels Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1304506/2023
- Decision date
- 22 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Fisher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing heard in private by telephone on 20 October 2023, Employment Judge Camp recorded a judgment by consent in case 1304506/2023. The claimant was Mr J Fisher and the respondent was Liberty Performance Steels Ltd.
The judgment states that the following complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal in accordance with rules 51 and 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure: redundancy pay, unlawful deductions from wages, breach of contract, and breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act 2010. The order does not record any substantive findings on liability or any hearing of the merits.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Dismissed upon withdrawal in accordance with rules 51 and 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed upon withdrawal in accordance with rules 51 and 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed upon withdrawal in accordance with rules 51 and 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim described as breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act 2010 and dismissed upon withdrawal in accordance with rules 51 and 52. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.