Case 1304517/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Makowska v Compass Group UK & Ireland Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1304517/2017
- Decision date
- 24 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mr W Dykes, Ms N Duncan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Makowska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the parties settled their differences on terms contained in a separate signed agreement.
By consent, the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal. No written reasons were provided in the judgment record, and no findings on the merits or remedy were set out.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant's claims were dismissed by consent on withdrawal following settlement; it does not separately identify outcomes for individual pleaded claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records settlement and dismissal by consent on withdrawal, without adjudicating this claim separately. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment records settlement and dismissal by consent on withdrawal, without adjudicating this claim separately. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records settlement and dismissal by consent on withdrawal, without adjudicating this claim separately. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records settlement and dismissal by consent on withdrawal, without adjudicating this claim separately. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.