Case 1304523/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Miss S Backhouse v Right Choice Insurance Brokers Ltd — 2021

Case reference: 1304523/2021
Decision date: 29 October 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Hindmarch Appearances

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss S Backhouse

Respondent

Right Choice Insurance Brokers Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Miss Backhouse applied for interim relief against Right Choice Insurance Brokers Ltd. Employment Judge Hindmarch refused the application on 28 October 2021, with the judgment dated 29 October 2021.

The tribunal did not determine the underlying merits of the substantive claims in this decision. It recorded the case as one of public interest disclosure (whistleblowing) and constructive unfair dismissal, and noted that the matter was already listed for a substantive hearing.

No remedy was awarded in this decision, and no compensatory or other monetary figure is recorded in the judgment text provided.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Whistleblowing	The judgment only records this as part of the claim for the purposes of the interim relief application; it does not determine the merits of the whistleblowing claim.	Other	—	—
Constructive dismissal	The judgment only records this as part of the claim for the purposes of the interim relief application; it does not determine the merits of the constructive unfair dismissal claim.	Other	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.