Case 1304526/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Kamara, Consultant For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1304526/2018
- Decision date
- 16 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Skehan Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr A Kamara, Consultant For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Watford on 16 September 2019 before Employment Judge Skehan, the tribunal dealt only with jurisdiction and limitation. The claimant was Mr K Ymeri and the respondent was Suez UK Limited.
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim for want of jurisdiction. It found that Mr Ymeri had not complied with the limitation requirements in s.111(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal also found that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented within the statutory time limit. No monetary remedy was awarded because the claim did not succeed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the claim was not presented within the statutory time limit under s.111(2) ERA 1996, and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.111(2) ERA 1996
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.