Mr L Dunn v Pubadubdub Limited — 2022

Case reference: 1304527/2020
Decision date: 25 January 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Hindmarch JUDGMENT
Venue: Birmingham

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr L Dunn

Respondent

Pubadubdub Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At Birmingham by CVP on 24 and 25 January 2022, Employment Judge Hindmarch found the complaint of unfair dismissal well founded and awarded £8,458.01. The tribunal also found the complaint of failure to pay accrued but untaken holiday pay well founded and awarded £2,304.

The tribunal further found that the Respondent failed to provide written reasons for dismissal and awarded £884, and failed to provide written particulars of employment and awarded £1,778. The extracted judgment records the outcomes and monetary awards without setting out additional reasoning, and the awards total £13,424.01.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Recorded from the judgment.	Upheld	—	£8,458
Holiday pay	Recorded from the judgment.	Upheld	—	£2,304
Other	Award recorded for failure to provide written reasons for dismissal.	Upheld	—	£884
Other	Award recorded for failure to provide written particulars of employment.	Upheld	—	£1,778

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £13,424; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.