Case 1304531/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Cichon v Compass Group UK & Ireland Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1304531/2018
- Decision date
- 17 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Byrne Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Cichon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew the whistle-blowing claims brought under sections 103A and 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Those claims were dismissed on withdrawal.
The judgment also records that the claimant withdrew claims for holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998, alternatively framed as unpaid wages. Those claims were also dismissed on withdrawal. No remedy or monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the whistle-blowing claims under sections 103A and 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the holiday pay claim under the Working Time Regulations 1998 was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the holiday pay claim was brought alternatively as a claim for unpaid wages and was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996
- Section 47B Employment Rights Act 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.