Case 1304546/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1304546/2021
- Decision date
- 6 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell
- Panel members
- Ms Campbell, Mr MZ Khan
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Birmingham on 3 to 6 January 2023, Employment Judge Gaskell sat with Ms Campbell and Mr MZ Khan to hear the claimant's disability discrimination complaint against Maximus UK Services Limited. The tribunal's unanimous judgment was that the respondent did not, at any time material to the claim, act in contravention of section 39 of the Equality Act 2010.
The claimant's complaint of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010, brought pursuant to section 120 of that Act, was dismissed. The decision record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010, brought pursuant to section 120, was dismissed. The tribunal also stated the respondent did not act in contravention of section 39 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.