Case 1304553/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Musasizi v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust Foundation — 2022
- Case reference
- 1304553/2021
- Decision date
- 5 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood Appearance
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Musasizi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr R Musasizi brought a claim of unfair dismissal arising from his summary dismissal by University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust Foundation. The tribunal found that his employment terminated on 7 May 2021, when he was told at the disciplinary hearing that he had been dismissed with immediate effect, and the later written confirmation did not change that effective date.
Applying section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal held that the claim was outside the three-month time limit even allowing for early conciliation. It found that early conciliation should have started by 6 August 2021, but it did not begin until 12 October 2021, and the claim was presented on 19 October 2021. The tribunal treated the claim as about 10 weeks and 3 days out of time.
The claimant said it had not been reasonably practicable to present the claim in time because he was pursuing an internal appeal, did not know the tribunal time limits, and only obtained legal advice after the appeal outcome. The tribunal accepted that he did not actually know the time limit, but held that this was not reasonable in the circumstances. It found that he had already researched and drafted his appeal using legal terminology, knew he could enforce his rights, and could have investigated how to bring an employment tribunal claim and the applicable time limits.
The tribunal rejected the suggestion that the respondent had deliberately delayed the appeal process or misled him so as to prevent a claim being brought in time. It also said that any delay in providing the transcript for the appeal was unfortunate but not deliberate, and that the respondent was under no duty to advise him how to bring tribunal proceedings. Because the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time, it did not need to decide whether any further period after the limit was reasonable, and the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed at preliminary hearing because the tribunal held the claim was presented out of time and that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented it within the statutory time limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
13 references- section 111(2) ERA 1996
- section 111(2A) ERA 1996
- reasonably practicable test
- Bodha (Vishnudut) v Hampshire Area Health Authority
- London Underground Ltd v Noel
- Porter v Bandridge
- Walls Meat v Khan
- Palmer v Southend Council
- Trevelyans (Birmingham) Ltd v Norton
- J Sainsbury Limited v Savage
- Beasley v National Grid Electricity Transmissions
- Cullinane v Balfour Beatty Engineering Services Limited
- Nolan v Balfour Beatty Engineering Services Limited
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.