Case 1304560/2018 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Ms M Morahan, Operations Manager — 2019
- Case reference
- 1304560/2018
- Decision date
- 11 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Richardson Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Birmingham on 11 July 2019, Employment Judge Richardson recorded that the parties had reached a settlement. The judgment states that the claims for unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay for the holiday year 2018/2019 were settled in full and dismissed.
The tribunal also adjourned the matter until 19 July 2019 for implementation of the agreement concerning holiday pay arrears for the holiday year 2017/2018. The parties were given liberty until 22 July 2019 to apply to restore the matter to a final hearing, and the judgment provided that if no such application was made the claimant consented to the matter being treated as withdrawn and dismissed on 23 July 2019.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claims for unlawful deduction from wages for the holiday year 2018/2019 were settled in full and dismissed. | Settled | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that holiday pay for the holiday year 2018/2019 was settled in full and dismissed. It also adjourned the matter to 19 July 2019 for implementation of the agreement in respect of holiday pay arrears for the holiday year 2017/2018, with liberty to apply to restore by 22 July 2019 and a statement that, if no application was made, the matter would be treated as withdrawn and dismissed on 23 July 2019. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.