Case 1304561/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Salt v All for You Care Home Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1304561/2021
- Decision date
- 27 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Salt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in default because the Respondent did not present a Response within the relevant time limit. The Tribunal therefore determined the claim on the materials before it and entered judgment against All for You Care Home Limited.
The Tribunal found that the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages. It ordered payment of £265.88 gross, reflecting the amount claimed for unpaid wages after deducting payments the Claimant acknowledged had already been made. The judgment records the calculation as £1,598.38 claimed for 168.25 hours at £9.50 per hour, less £1,332.50 already paid.
The Tribunal also found that the Respondent had failed to pay mileage expenses in breach of contract. It ordered payment of £319.59 gross in respect of that breach, calculated by reference to 710.2 miles at 45p per mile. The judgment states that the sums payable were gross amounts and that the Claimant was responsible for any income tax and National Insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment in default. The tribunal held the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £265.88, calculated from £1,598.38 claimed for unpaid wages for 168.25 hours at £9.50 per hour, less £1,332.50 acknowledged as already paid. | Upheld | — | £266 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the Respondent had failed to pay mileage expenses in breach of contract and ordered payment of the gross sum of £319.59, calculated on 710.2 miles at 45p per mile. | Upheld | — | £320 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £585
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.