Case 1304572/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Mr M Khan v -v- Splendid Hospitality Group LLP FINAL MERITS HEARING (CONDUCTED IN PUBLIC AS A HYBRID HEARING VIA THE CLOUD VIDEO PLATFORM) — 2024

Case reference: 1304572/2023
Decision date: 30 October 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Perry
Panel members: Mr I Morrison, Ms H Russell

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr M Khan

Respondent

-v- Splendid Hospitality Group LLP FINAL MERITS HEARING (CONDUCTED IN PUBLIC AS A HYBRID HEARING VIA THE CLOUD VIDEO PLATFORM)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The final merits hearing was held at Centre City Tower, Birmingham, on 28 to 30 October 2024 before Employment Judge Perry with Mr I Morrison and Ms H Russell sitting as lay members. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Miss V Hall, consultant. The tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing and the written record states that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time.

The tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaints under Part 5 of the Equality Act 2010. It found that the respondent did not directly discriminate against the claimant because of race or because of disability. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Race discrimination	The judgment states that the respondent did not directly discriminate against the claimant because of race.	Dismissed	Race	—
Disability discrimination	The judgment states that the respondent did not directly discriminate against the claimant because of disability.	Dismissed	Disability	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.