Case 1304578/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Snow, Lay Representative For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1304578/2017
- Decision date
- 13 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harding
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Snow, Lay Representative For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. The judgment does not set out the underlying factual findings or legal reasoning beyond that disposal.
The claimant's direct race discrimination claim, age discrimination claim, and detriment/dismissal claim based on having made a public interest disclosure were all dismissed by consent on withdrawal by the claimant. No remedy was awarded and the judgment records no separate compensation figures.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed by consent on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Age discrimination | Dismissed by consent on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Whistleblowing | The claimant's detriment/dismissal claim based on having made a public interest disclosure was dismissed by consent on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.