Case 1304589/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W K Stronski v Rwt Commercial Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1304589/2021
- Decision date
- 23 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Findlay JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W K Stronski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 3 December 2021, the Tribunal gave Mr W K Stronski an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that there had been no response to the Tribunal’s letters dated 2 November 2021 and 10 November 2021, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Stronski did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Findlay therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written reasons do not separate the underlying heads of claim; the judgment says only that 'the claim' was struck out after the claimant failed to respond and failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The written reasons do not separate the underlying heads of claim; the judgment says only that 'the claim' was struck out after the claimant failed to respond and failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.