Case 1304612/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Atlas v Interserve (Facilities Management) Limited FINAL HEARING — 2019
- Case reference
- 1304612/2018
- Decision date
- 17 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Members
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mrs S Petrulis, Mr P Tsouvallaris
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Atlas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing in Birmingham on 16 and 17 October 2019, before Employment Judge Camp sitting with Mrs S Petrulis and Mr P Tsouvallaris, the tribunal determined Miss S Atlas’s claims against Interserve (Facilities Management) Limited. The tribunal dismissed the race discrimination complaint and upheld the age discrimination complaint.
On remedy, the tribunal awarded a total of £5,957.47. That sum was made up of £5,500 for injury to feelings and £457.47 for lost earnings, assessed on a loss-of-a-chance basis. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and written reasons were not to be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Award comprised £5,500 for injury to feelings and £457.47 for lost earnings on a loss-of-a-chance basis. | Upheld | Age | £5,957 |
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,957
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £457
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.