Case 1304712/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Paul Carney v Hintonpayne Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1304712/2021
- Decision date
- 23 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hena Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Paul Carney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Birmingham CVP hearing on 23 March 2022 before Employment Judge Hena Representation, the tribunal found that the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction of wages in relation to 1 week's notice pay was well founded. It ordered the respondent to pay £603.65 gross.
The tribunal also found the claimant's holiday pay complaint well founded in respect of 2 days' holiday pay, and ordered £280.00 gross. It recorded a 10% ACAS uplift on that failure, quantified at £24.00.
Separately, the tribunal found that the respondent breached s.8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 by failing to provide all of the claimant's payslips, and ordered payment of £603.65. The complaint that the respondent failed to provide a contract of written particulars was dismissed.
On case management matters before the merits were decided, the respondent's application to postpone the hearing was refused, and the claimant's application to amend the claim to add unfair dismissal was refused, so no unfair dismissal claim was determined on the merits.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint relating to 1 week's notice pay; tribunal ordered £603.65 gross. | Upheld | — | £604 |
| Holiday pay | Complaint relating to 2 days' holiday pay; tribunal ordered £280.00 gross and recorded a 10% ACAS uplift of £24.00. | Upheld | — | £304 |
| Other | Complaint under s.8 Employment Rights Act 1996 for failure to provide all payslips; tribunal ordered £603.65. | Upheld | — | £604 |
| Other | Complaint that the respondent failed to provide a contract of written particulars was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,511
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.8 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.