Case 1304760/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H TRACEY v RG Plants Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 1304760/2021
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H TRACEY
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal proceeded under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a Response within the relevant time limit. In default, Employment Judge Jones entered judgment for the claimant, Ms H Tracey, against RG Plants Limited.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £133.76 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £66.88 gross.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,001.86 gross. The total ordered was £1,202.50 gross, with the judgment stating that the claimant is responsible for any income tax and National Insurance contributions on the sums awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £134 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £67 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,002 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,203
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.