Case 1304787/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Andrea Donnellan v Count-Up Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1304787/2021
- Decision date
- 3 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Kelly Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Andrea Donnellan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that it had already concluded that Ms Andrea Donnellan was unfairly dismissed on 28 October 2022. At the remedy hearing on 19 and 20 December 2022 before Employment Judge C Kelly, the respondent was ordered to pay £8,253.60 by 4 pm on 3 January 2023.
The award was made up of a basic award of £6,936 after a 50% reduction, holiday pay of £219.60 for two days at £109.80 per day, and £1,098 described as compensation for no statement of terms. The order does not set out additional liability reasoning beyond the earlier unfair dismissal conclusion.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The order records that the tribunal had concluded the claimant was unfairly dismissed on 28 October 2022, and the basic award was reduced by 50%. | Upheld | — | £6,936 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay was ordered at 2 days x £109.80 per day. | Upheld | — | £220 |
| Other | Listed in the order as compensation for no statement of terms. | Upheld | — | £1,098 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,254
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £6,936
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,098
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.