Case 1304827/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Parker v Fruitful Mortgage Solutions Limited Heard: by CVP — 2022
- Case reference
- 1304827/2021
- Decision date
- 3 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Codd Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Parker
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to respond to, or participate in, the proceedings. Mr P Parker was found to have been an employee of Fruitful Mortgage Solutions Limited between 6 September 2021 and 12 September 2021.
The tribunal upheld a claim for unauthorised deductions from wages. It found that the respondent had not paid the claimant for that period, and that the unpaid wages totalled £480.77 gross.
The tribunal also upheld a breach of contract claim. It found that the respondent had breached paragraph 3 of the employment contract by dismissing the claimant without giving him one week's notice pay, also assessed at £480.77 gross.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £961.54 in total within 28 days, with appropriate tax and national insurance deductions to be made and the net amount sent to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay wages for the period 06.09.21 to 12.09.21, amounting to £480.77 gross. | Upheld | — | £481 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent breached paragraph 3 of the employment contract by dismissing the claimant without giving one week's notice pay, valued at £480.77 gross. | Upheld | — | £481 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £962
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.