Case 1304828/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Randeep Sundar v Global Capital Partners Limited T/A REMAX — 2022
- Case reference
- 1304828/2021
- Decision date
- 5 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge W Brady Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham ET
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Randeep Sundar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Randeep Sundar, was dismissed on 27 October 2021. The tribunal did not record any finding in this judgment on the dismissal itself beyond that fact.
The tribunal found that the respondent, Global Capital Partners Limited T/A REMAX, had unlawfully deducted one month's pay from the claimant's wages without his authorisation. It held that this was in breach of section 13(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,291 gross, and stated that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on that sum. The total amount payable under the judgment was £2,291.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent deducted one month's pay from the claimant's wages without his authorisation, in breach of section 13(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The order was for £2,291 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,291 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,291
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.