Case 1304835/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P James v Ego Lounge Ltd (Dissolved) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1304835/2021
- Decision date
- 5 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P James
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Ego Lounge Ltd was in administration and that neither the Administrator's consent nor the permission of the court had been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. On that basis, the Tribunal concluded the claim could not proceed.
The Tribunal also noted that on 18 July 2023 it had given the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
No remedy was awarded. The decision is dated 5 January 2024 and is signed by Employment Judge Camp.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying substantive claim type; it records only that 'the claim is struck out' because the respondent company was in administration and the required consent/permission had not been obtained, and because the claimant failed to give an acceptable reason after the Tribunal's 18 July 2023 direction. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.