Case 1304840/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr I Allen THE Respondent having confirmed that the claim is not contested, and on the basis of the information before me — 2020
- Case reference
- 1304840/2020
- Decision date
- 23 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was dealt with at a telephone hearing on 22 July 2020. The respondent confirmed that the claim was not contested, and the tribunal proceeded on the basis of the information before it. Employment Judge Hughes signed the judgment on 23 July 2020.
The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,887.50. It recorded that the claimant had taken all reasonable steps to recover that sum from the respondent.
The tribunal also found that the claimant’s claim for breach of contract in respect of notice pay was well-founded, and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £3,596.15. In addition, the claimant’s claim for unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of outstanding wages was well-founded, and the respondent was ordered to pay £317.30 gross on that claim.
The judgment contains no discrimination findings or other contested liability issues. The monetary awards recorded in the judgment total £6,800.95.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment and accepted that he had taken all reasonable steps to recover the sum from the respondent. | Upheld | — | £2,888 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the notice pay claim was well-founded and awarded damages in that amount. | Upheld | — | £3,596 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the claim for outstanding wages was well-founded and ordered payment of the gross sum stated. | Upheld | — | £317 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,801
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.