Case 1304852/2021 · Employment Tribunal
no appearance v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1304852/2021
- Decision date
- 5 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
1 namedClaimant
no appearance
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant brought claims of disability discrimination. It found that he had repeatedly failed to comply with tribunal orders and directions, including requirements to provide an adequate disability impact statement, supporting medical evidence, and a schedule of loss within the ordered timetable. The claimant also repeatedly failed to copy correspondence and documents to the respondent despite express requests.
The respondent applied for strike out after the ordered disability-related material was not provided. The tribunal noted that the material eventually sent by the claimant still did not address key issues previously identified, including the effects of the alleged disability at the relevant times and dates of diagnosis, and that no adequate medical information had been provided despite clear orders.
At the hearing on 5 January 2023, the claimant did not attend, did not contact the tribunal, and attempts to contact him were unsuccessful. In those circumstances, and given the history of material non-compliance, the tribunal dismissed the claims under rule 47 for failure to attend, and vacated the future listed hearings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states the claimant brought claims of disability discrimination. The claims were dismissed under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claimant did not attend the hearing and had a history of non-compliance. The tribunal also noted the claims were likely to have been struck out and/or dismissed on the disability issue, but that was not the operative disposal. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.