Case 1304857/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Scott v Sambeer Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1304857/2020
- Decision date
- 15 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Scott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Hughes. The tribunal found that Mr M Scott was dismissed by reason of redundancy and that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,325.00.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay Mr Scott's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £237.74 gross. It further found that he was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,375.00 gross damages.
The judgment records no discrimination or other claims. The monetary awards identified in the judgment total £5,937.74.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment says the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,325.00. | Upheld | — | £3,325 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to failure to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and orders £237.74 gross. The text does not state a separate legal basis for the holiday claim. | Upheld | — | £238 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment says the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards £2,375.00 gross damages. | Upheld | — | £2,375 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,938
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.