Case 1304865/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Daniels v Changes Asian Kitchen Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1304865/2020
- Decision date
- 1 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Daniels
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment in case 1304865/2020 between Mr B Daniels and Changes Asian Kitchen Limited. The tribunal said that by letter dated 28 April 2020 it had given the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing of the claim.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37.
The hearing listed for 1 June 2020 was vacated and did not take place. The judgment does not record any monetary award or any substantive determination of the underlying claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was struck out under rule 37 after the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 28 April 2020 to make representations or request a hearing. The judgment says the claimant failed to make representations, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.