Case 1304866/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr I Allen THE Respondent having confirmed that the claim is not contested, and on the basis of the information before me — 2020
- Case reference
- 1304866/2020
- Decision date
- 23 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a telephone hearing on 22 July 2020, Employment Judge Hughes recorded that the respondent confirmed the claim was not contested, and the tribunal decided the matter on the information before it. The claimant, Mr J Dass, succeeded on all heads of claim.
The tribunal found that Mr Dass was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,725.00 and stated that it was satisfied he had taken all reasonable steps to recover that sum from the respondent. It also found his breach of contract claim for notice pay well-founded and awarded damages of £5,519.22.
The tribunal upheld two claims for unauthorised deductions from wages: £673.07 for outstanding wages and £4,172.42 for mileage expenses. It further found well-founded a claim for repayment of a loan made to the respondent and ordered payment of £1,000.00. The decision records a total of £16,089.71 across the five awards.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal was satisfied that the claimant had taken all reasonable steps to recover the redundancy payment from the respondent. | Upheld | — | £4,725 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay; the tribunal found it well-founded and awarded damages. | Upheld | — | £5,519 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for outstanding wages, described by the tribunal as unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £673 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for mileage expenses, described by the tribunal as unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £4,172 |
| Other | The judgment refers to repayment of a loan made to the respondent but does not label the claim by a more specific legal head. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,090
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.