Case 1304886/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Ms N Toner (Solicitor) For the first v No appearance For the second respondent: No appearance — 2019

Case reference: 1304886/2018
Decision date: 20 October 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Choudry Case

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms N Toner (Solicitor) For the first

Respondent

No appearance For the second respondent: No appearance

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The operative judgment entry for case 1304886/2018 records that Ms Ginnette Smith’s claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. No substantive liability finding or remedy is recorded against this case number, and the judgment therefore contains no award for it.

The same document is a collective protective-award decision for other claimants in the group proceedings against SP Group Ltd (In Administration), finding a failure to comply with section 188 TULRCA and awarding a 90-day protected period from 24 July 2018. Those findings relate to the wider case schedule rather than to this withdrawn claim. The extracted text also contains an internal inconsistency: the schedule later lists case number 1304886/2018 as Sarah Powell.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The operative judgment gives no substantive claim type for this case; it states only that the claim under case number 1304886/2018 was dismissed upon withdrawal. The schedule later lists case number 1304886/2018 as Sarah Powell rather than Ms Ginnette Smith, so the claimant name attached to this case number is inconsistent within the extracted text.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.