Case 1304898/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs F Z Mamoojee v Alliance Clinical Services Limited and 4 others — 2025
- Case reference
- 1304898/2024
- Decision date
- 26 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Codd Appearances
Parties
6 namedClaimant
Mrs F Z Mamoojee
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 26 June 2025 before Employment Judge Codd, the tribunal struck out the claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(b), (c) and (d). The written judgment states that the strike out was because the manner in which the proceedings had been conducted had been unreasonable, because of non-compliance with the tribunal’s orders, and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The record does not set out any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying complaints, and it does not award any remedy. It is also noted that the reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claims in this short written record; it states that 'the claim' was struck out under Rule 38(1)(b), (c) and (d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(b), (c) and (d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.