Case 1304906/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Whitmore and v Hi-Speed Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1304906/2020
- Decision date
- 9 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Choudry On
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Whitmore and
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr R Whitmore brought claims for holiday pay, unlawful deduction of wages and outstanding pay against Hi-Speed Services Limited. The respondent did not file a response. The tribunal proceeded on the evidence available at the hearing on 13 September 2022, including the respondent's wage slips and timesheets for August to December 2019. The claimant did not attend.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant worked as a driver from 23 August 2019 to 1 December 2019, after an earlier period of employment from 15 October 2018 to 30 April 2019. It found that he was paid £8.81 per hour for basic hours, £11.02 for overtime, £11.75 for Saturday work, and £30 for each overnight allowance. On that basis, it accepted shortfalls in tax months 6, 7, 8 and 9 for underpaid wages and night-out allowances, including £96.70, £6.10, £107.68, £30, £13.82 and £30 for the later period.
The tribunal rejected the claimant's attempt to recover a £70.60 deduction, finding that the respondent had shown this sum related to an overpayment caused by hours overclaimed on the claimant's timesheets on 28 August, 2 September, 3 September and 4 September 2019. It also accepted the respondent's calculation that the claimant's holiday pay should have been worked out by reference to the preceding 12 weeks because his pay varied, and found a holiday pay shortfall of £104.47 on that basis.
The claim for holiday pay relating to the earlier employment period was dismissed as out of time. The tribunal held that no evidence had been given to show that it was not reasonably practicable to present that complaint within the applicable time limit under regulation 30(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. In total, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £388.77 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal accepted underpaid wages and unpaid night-out allowances for tax months 6 to 9, but rejected the £70.60 deduction claim because the respondent showed it related to an overpayment after the claimant overclaimed hours on his timesheets. | Upheld | — | £284 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the later-period holiday pay had been undercalculated because the respondent used basic pay only; holiday pay for the earlier employment period ending 30 April 2019 was found to be out of time and not awarded. | Upheld | — | £104 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £389
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
7 references- regulation 16(1) and 16(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 221 ERA 1996
- section 222 ERA 1996
- regulation 30(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 30(3) Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 13 ERA 1996
- section 27 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.