Case 1304929/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Ms. Whelan, Consultant — 2022
- Case reference
- 1304929/2021
- Decision date
- 25 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an open preliminary hearing on whether the claimant met the definition of disability under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 for the period 21 March 2021 to 16 September 2021. The claimant said she had long-standing anxiety, had been prescribed sertraline since 2017, and her mental health had worsened from March 2021. The respondent accepted that she had anxiety but argued that the relevant condition relied on was mixed anxiety and depressive disorder, which was not formally diagnosed until 27 September 2021.
The tribunal accepted the claimant as a credible witness and accepted the medical evidence showing anxiety from 2017, ongoing treatment with sertraline, and continuing medication at the maximum dose of 200mg. It found that, without that medication, the claimant would experience panic attacks, difficulty getting out of bed or attending work, and suicidal ideation. On that basis, the tribunal held that the claimant's anxiety had a substantial and long-term adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities and therefore amounted to a disability.
Although the tribunal was not persuaded that there was sufficient material to prove that the specific diagnosis of mixed anxiety and depressive disorder was present throughout the whole period from 21 March 2021 to 16 September 2021, it rejected the respondent's submission that the claim failed because that diagnosis was only made on 27 September 2021. The tribunal held that a claimant does not need to identify a particular diagnosis in order to satisfy section 6, and that the focus is on the effects of the impairment at the material time. It concluded that the claimant was a disabled person at the relevant time by reason of anxiety and could proceed with her disability discrimination claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal found the claimant was disabled within section 6 Equality Act 2010 by reason of anxiety at the relevant time. The merits of any disability discrimination complaint were not determined in this judgment. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- s.212 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 2 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 5 Equality Act 2010
- SCA Packaging Limited v Boyle
- Patel v Metropolitan Borough Council
- Nissa v Waverley Education Foundation Limited
- Leonard v Southern Derbyshire Chamber of Commerce
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.