Case 1304945/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Bashford 1st v Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2nd Respondent: Richard Laverick 3rd Respondent: Rebecca Geraghty 4th Respondent: Tim Isaac — 2019
- Case reference
- 1304945/2018
- Decision date
- 13 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Bashford 1st
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Birmingham on 13 December 2019, before Employment Judge Flood, the tribunal recorded that the hearing was postponed by consent for implementation of the settlement agreed that day. The order was made in respect of the proceedings brought by Ms J Bashford against the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board and the individual respondents.
The tribunal did not determine the merits of the claims. Instead, it gave the parties liberty to apply on or before 10 January 2020. The order stated that if no application was made by that date, the claim would be treated as withdrawn and dismissed in accordance with Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, with effect from 10 January 2020.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | By consent, the hearing was postponed for implementation of the settlement agreed on 13 December 2019. The tribunal did not determine liability. The order stated that if no application was made on or before 10 January 2020, the claim would be treated as withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. | Settled | — | — |
| Trade union | By consent, the hearing was postponed for implementation of the settlement agreed on 13 December 2019. The tribunal did not determine liability. The order stated that if no application was made on or before 10 January 2020, the claim would be treated as withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. | Settled | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | By consent, the hearing was postponed for implementation of the settlement agreed on 13 December 2019. The tribunal did not determine liability. The order stated that if no application was made on or before 10 January 2020, the claim would be treated as withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the hearing was postponed for implementation of the settlement agreed on 13 December 2019. The tribunal did not determine liability. The order stated that if no application was made on or before 10 January 2020, the claim would be treated as withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.