Case 1304961/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Tasleem Tasab v Serene Sleep Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1304961/2023
- Decision date
- 15 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Tasleem Tasab
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant's complaints of unauthorised deductions from pay, breach of contract, holiday pay, and unfair dismissal were all found to be well-founded. The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from pay for the period 1 May to 12 May 2023 and ordered payment of £3,076.92 gross. It also found a well-founded breach of contract complaint in relation to notice pay and awarded £18,461.54 as damages, calculated on a gross basis to reflect the likelihood that the amount would be taxed as Post Employment Notice Pay.
On holiday pay, the tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction by failing to pay for 11 days of holiday pay accrued but untaken at termination, and ordered £3,384.61 gross. The unfair dismissal complaint under Part X Employment Rights Act 1996 also succeeded, and the tribunal awarded a basic award of £11,574 and a compensatory award of £25,028. The respondent did not attend the hearing.
The tribunal did not accept that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment. Under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996, it determined that no redundancy payment was due. It also stated that the Recoupment Regulations did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from pay for the period 1 May to 12 May 2023 and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £3,077 |
| Breach of contract | The claim concerned notice pay. The tribunal awarded damages calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood of taxation as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £18,462 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from pay arising from 11 days' holiday pay accrued but untaken at termination. | Upheld | — | £3,385 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and made a basic award of £11,574 and a compensatory award of £25,028. | Upheld | — | £36,602 |
| Redundancy | Under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996 the tribunal determined that the claimant was not entitled to a redundancy payment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £61,525
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £11,574
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £25,028
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- Part II Employment Rights Act 1996
- Part X Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Recoupment Regulations
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.