Case 1304976/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr I Allen THE Respondent having confirmed that the claim is not contested, and on the basis of the information before me — 2020
- Case reference
- 1304976/2020
- Decision date
- 23 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was dealt with at a telephone hearing before Employment Judge Hughes on 22 July 2020. The respondent confirmed that the claim was not contested, and the tribunal decided the case on the information before it.
The tribunal found that Mrs S Field was entitled to a redundancy payment of £548.00. It recorded that it was satisfied she had taken all reasonable steps to recover that sum from the respondent.
The tribunal also found that the claimant’s breach of contract claim in respect of notice pay was well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £595.45 in damages. In addition, the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages, relating to outstanding wages and holiday pay, was well-founded and the respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £274.72. The judgment records no further remedies beyond these three awards.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal was satisfied the claimant had taken all reasonable steps to recover the redundancy payment from the respondent. | Upheld | — | £548 |
| Breach of contract | The claim was for notice pay and was described as well-founded. | Upheld | — | £595 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim concerned outstanding wages and holiday pay; the tribunal awarded the gross sum stated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £275 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,418
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.