Case 1304978/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Gedvilaite v Pailton Engineering Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1304978/2020
- Decision date
- 16 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Ms R Pelter, Mr D Faulconbridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Gedvilaite
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Birmingham Employment Tribunal, the claimant, Ms J Gedvilaite, brought claims for unfair dismissal, indirect sex discrimination and unpaid holiday pay. The judgment records that all three of those claims were found to be ill-founded and dismissed.
The claimant’s separate claim for a redundancy payment did not proceed to a merits determination. The judgment states that it was dismissed on withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states this claim was ill-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment describes this as indirect sex discrimination and says it was ill-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to unpaid holiday pay and says this claim was ill-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment says the redundancy payment claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.