Case 1304980/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Martin-Harris v West Midlands Ambulance Service University NHS Foundation Trust FINAL HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 1304980/2023
- Decision date
- 17 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Martin-Harris
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing on 17 September 2024, Employment Judge Camp considered Miss A Martin-Harris's claim against West Midlands Ambulance Service University NHS Foundation Trust about a deduction from wages. The tribunal held that section 14(1)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 applied to the deduction the Respondent made from the Claimant's wages in relation to the proceedings.
Because that statutory exception applied, the Claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim failed and was dismissed. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that section 14(1)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 applied to the deduction made from the Claimant's wages, so the claim failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 14(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.