Case 1304996/2023 · Employment Tribunal
in person v - Mr P Soni (lay Representative) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1304996/2023
- Decision date
- 12 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Allenby, who appeared in person, brought the case against the Secretary of State for Business and Trade. The matter was heard by video in Birmingham on 12 August 2024 before Employment Judge Broughton. The written judgment records that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment agreed at £7,059.15.
The judgment also records that the claimant's other claims failed and were dismissed on time limit grounds. The written record does not give separate merits findings on those other heads of claim, and it states that reasons were given orally at the hearing. No lay members are listed, and the judgment does not identify any further remedy beyond the agreed redundancy payment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal recorded that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment agreed at £7,059.15. | Upheld | — | £7,059 |
| Breach of contract | The written record does not separately identify this head of claim; it is taken from the GOV.UK listing. The tribunal said the claimant's other claims were dismissed on time limit grounds. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written record does not separately identify this head of claim; it is taken from the GOV.UK listing. The tribunal said the claimant's other claims were dismissed on time limit grounds. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The written record does not separately identify this head of claim; it is taken from the GOV.UK listing. The tribunal said the claimant's other claims were dismissed on time limit grounds. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,059
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.