Case 1305006/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Barry v Marilyn Roberts t/a We Make & Mend — 2021
- Case reference
- 1305006/2020
- Decision date
- 11 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Barry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21. It found that Miss C Barry had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered Marilyn Roberts t/a We Make & Mend to pay damages of £2,232.00. It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £3,348.00.
The unfair dismissal claim succeeded, but the judgment did not determine the remedy for that claim. The decision records that the unfair dismissal remedy would be determined at a Remedy Hearing. The monetary awards made in this judgment therefore total £5,580.00, being the damages for notice and the redundancy payment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £2,232.00. | Upheld | — | £2,232 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £3,348.00. | Upheld | — | £3,348 |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim succeeded, but the remedy was not determined in this judgment and was left to a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,580
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.