Case 1305007/2021 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Livingwell Supported Housing Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1305007/2021
- Decision date
- 19 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss J Rathband, appeared in person and the respondent did not appear. The tribunal corrected the respondent’s name to Livingwell Supported Housing Limited. It found that the respondent had failed to compensate the claimant for holiday leave accrued at the termination of employment under the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered payment of £397 gross for that accrued leave entitlement.
In a separate finding, the tribunal held that the respondent was in breach of its duty under sections 1(1) and/or 4(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It made an additional award of £750 gross, described as two weeks’ pay, under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. No other remedy, interest, or uplift was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to compensate the claimant for holiday leave accrued at termination under the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered £397 gross. | Upheld | — | £397 |
| Other | The tribunal found a breach of the duty under sections 1(1) and/or 4(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and made an additional award of two weeks' pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,147
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.