Case 1305013/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Tisdals v Fusion Landscaping and Facilities Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1305013/2024
- Decision date
- 26 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Tisdals
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 19 September 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on whether the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with Tribunal orders dated 14 May 2024, 4 September 2024 and 9 September 2024, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not provide sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The reasons record that the claimant confirmed the Tribunal should "go forward with the strike out". The claim was therefore struck out, and the hearing listed for 3 and 4 October 2024 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type in the extracted text. It records only that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with Tribunal orders and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.