Case 1305019/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Newton v Welcome Nurseries Limited (In Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1305019/2021
- Decision date
- 1 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Findlay Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Newton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs S Newton brought claims against Welcome Nurseries Limited for failure to pay holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998 and for unauthorised deduction of wages. The respondent did not attend the hearing in Birmingham on 1 June 2022, and Regional Employment Judge Findlay found both claims well founded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,245.89 gross. That sum comprised £441.45 for 3 days' holiday pay, calculated at 7.5 hours at £19.62 per hour, together with £323.75 for arrears of pay for training and staff meetings and £480.69 for arrears of overtime pay. The judgment did not provide any further apportionment of the wage arrears between separate claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claim for failure to pay holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998 well founded. The award for this head was calculated as 3 days' holiday pay at 7.5 x 19.62. | Upheld | — | £441 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for unauthorised deduction of wages well founded. The judgment awarded arrears of pay for training and staff meetings (£323.75) and arrears of overtime pay (£480.69), but did not split those two components further between claims. | Upheld | — | £804 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,246
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.