Case 1305027/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Elesinnla (Counsel) For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1305027/2021
- Decision date
- 3 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dean Members
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr K Hutchinson, Ms M Stewart
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr A Elesinnla (Counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Birmingham by CVP on 27 to 31 March 2023, with judgment given on 2 May 2023. The panel was Employment Judge Dean, with members Mr K Hutchinson and Ms M Stewart. The claimant was represented by Mr A Elesinnla and the respondent by Ms S Bowen.
The tribunal found that the respondent did not discriminate against the claimant because of race, contrary to section 13 of the Equality Act 2010. The claimant’s complaints before the Employment Tribunal were dismissed. The record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note to the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the respondent did not discriminate against the claimant because of race in breach of section 13 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.