Case 1305032/2018 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1305032/2018
- Decision date
- 15 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry Members
- Panel members
- Mrs S Ray, Mr M Moosa
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final merits hearing in Birmingham on 13-15 January 2019, before Employment Judge Perry with members Mrs S Ray and Mr M Moosa, the tribunal dismissed Mr Christopher Goodall's unfair dismissal complaint as not well founded.
The tribunal also dismissed the disability discrimination complaints. It held that DHL Services Ltd did not fail to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20-22 Equality Act 2010 and did not treat the claimant unfavourably because of something arising from disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010.
The claimant withdrew his holiday pay and unlawful deduction from wages complaints after the respondent confirmed that it did not intend to pursue any complaint in relation to alleged overpayments. The judgment records those complaints as dismissed on withdrawal. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint under sections 20-22 Equality Act 2010 alleging failure to make reasonable adjustments was dismissed; the tribunal found the respondent did not contravene those provisions. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint under section 15 Equality Act 2010 alleging unfavourable treatment because of something arising from disability was dismissed; the tribunal found the respondent did not contravene that provision. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant withdrew this complaint after the respondent confirmed it did not intend to pursue any complaint about alleged overpayments; the judgment records it as dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant withdrew this complaint after the respondent confirmed it did not intend to pursue any complaint about alleged overpayments; the judgment records it as dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- sections 20-22 Equality Act 2010
- section 15 Equality Act 2010
- Part 5 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.