Case 1305048/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Wilson v VPS PVT Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1305048/2021
- Decision date
- 5 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Edmonds Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by CVP at Birmingham on 5 July 2022 before Employment Judge Edmonds, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by its director, Mr A Singh. The tribunal recorded that the hearing was fully remote and that a face-to-face hearing was not practicable.
The tribunal upheld the claimant’s unlawful deduction from wages claim. It found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £715.84.
The decision record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on the judgment. No additional findings, legal test, or split of the award beyond the net sum were recorded in the written judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £715.84. | Upheld | — | £716 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £716
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.